ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Lotus/Ferrari

To: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>,
Subject: Re: Lotus/Ferrari
From: "Barry Spencer" <bspencer@tsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:18:16 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
To: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; "John J. Stimson-III"
<john@harlie.idsfa.net>
Cc: "BayArea Team.Net" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Lotus


> -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
>
> Message text written by "John J. Stimson-III"
>
> "The Esprit certainly is not.  However, the Elise and its variants sold
> by Lotus can only be registered for the street by dodging around the
> laws.  I guess that is what Scot probably meant. "
>
>
> -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
>
> I think you're correct. But a "gray market" I'm more familar with concerns
> cameras purchased overseas and for which the manufacturer will not honor
> any warranties.
>
> In the Elise's case, the sale is direct from the manufacturer. Their web
> page is pretty specific that you can't drive it on the street.
> Oh, BTW, did you see the June issue of Road & Track which ranks the Elise
> second only to a Ferrari as a good handling car?
>
> --John Kelly

I wonder how much Ferrari paid  R&T????  A Ferrari is nothing better than a
luxury truck to drive. You need a 24Hr fitness membership to drive the darn
things.
You drive a Lotus V8 Twin Turbo Esprit and then drive a Ferrari and I bet
you'll pick the Lotus. Ferrari's are way over rated.

Barry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>