| To: | ba-autox@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: shifting, was Re: 2500 lb Miata? |
| From: | Smokerbros@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Oct 2001 00:52:46 EDT |
James writes: > > ah, well, i was referring to an earlier email where the question was > whether > > to downshift or not to 1st, and then back to 2nd. my comments pertained > to > > staying in 2nd, not staying in 1st. > Okay. And in most cars, most corners, you're better off lugging a bit in 2nd than downshifing and upshifting again. Notable exceptions: Torqueless Type Rs, and 1st Gen MR-2s... CHD |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: shifting, was Re: 2500 lb Miata?, Mark J. Andy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2500 lb Miata?, John J. Stimson-III |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: shifting, was Re: 2500 lb Miata?, Mark J. Andy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: shifting, was Re: 2500 lb Miata?, Clifford Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |