ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Nationals Course--not!

To: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>, <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Nationals Course--not!
From: Lolita and Mike <lomike@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 20:07:40 -0700
on 10/4/01 9:30 AM, Mark J. Andy at marka@telerama.com wrote:

> Howdy,
> 
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, John Kelly wrote:
>> We are in agreement. The solution achieved long ago was to mark our courses
>> here in the San Francisco area on both sides with gypsum (or white powder
>> of some kind) and thus nobody gets lost at speed. Our friends elsewhere
>> continued to utilize gate-style courses with no markings. This latter type
>> of course has two results,
> 
> Hey, seems like some sorta intrastate rivalry, but just for those folks
> that don't leave SF... Every national event I've been to has had a lined
> course, including nationals this year.  I find national level course
> _easier_ to follow because its relatively easy to pick out the key
> features as there aren't a ton of unimportant cones all over the damn
> place.
> 
> They also use pointer cones.  Personally, I think pointer cones are more
> important for not getting lost than a lined course.  Lines disapear in the
> rain #1.  #2, if you're running the course based on the white lines,
> chances are you're screwing it up.  #3, white lines are hard to see at
> speed.
> 
>> 1) beginners who get lost do not return;
>> 2) The club loses income;
>> 3) People who can figure out an unmarked course gain a false sense
>> of security because they are beating people who got lost.
> 
> Wow.  You much have some real whimps out here. :-)
> 
>> I drove the National North course entirely in second gear and found it to
>> be greatly similar to the course we'd driven at Albany just before. Pat
>> drove the South course, also entirely in second gear. Thus I think the
>> speed levels this year were not much different than what we face at home.
>> That hasn't always been true and there has been a backlash against the
>> so-called "speed creep."
> 
> FWIW, I was using 3rd gear on the South course in a cp mustang with a
> stock t5 and 3.73's.  Last year on Frank's "way too fast" south course, I
> never got outta 2nd gear (stock t5, 3:55's).  They were comparably fast
> IMHO.
> 
> Just because I'm like this, I'd like to see what people would say if
> Nationals ran Frank's course from the past weekend's AAS event.  Rev
> limiter in 3rd in a street tire miata :-)  (6 speed, roughly 75mph)  Oh,
> and before anyone starts whining, it was safe and AAS isn't affiliated
> with the SCCA.
> 
> Mark
No whine, no cheese, just curious, what exactly are you learning about car
control at that point?
MJ

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>