Hey, guys, he wants a car he can put the top down on...show him an
Impreza convertible and he might go for it!
--Pat Kelly
"Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}" wrote:
>
> Get the WRX wagon. Sure it's a tad heavier and has a marginally narrower
> track than the sedan, but you can put all your tires in the back. Or your
> mountain bikes when you're not autoxing. And it works out to ~$1k cheaper
> because it's $500 less to start, and you don't need to add the wing to hide
> the sedan's odd-looking concave trunk lid.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Chafin [mailto:bchafin@attglobal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:58 AM
> Cc: Vitaly Iourtchenko; Derek Butts; craig boyle;
> ba-autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Seven Year Itch
>
> I agree on all accounts. When faced with this kind of performance
> value/aesthetic quandary I choose on the performance/value side and
> order the car in Black ; ), which, tends to mute the style (?) lines.
>
> Wow, an SCCA license with the purchase on a new car. Now that sure
> sounds like a 4-Door Sports car to me... Hmmm, any thoughts on the
> RX-8? Maybe it'll include a Street School too : ).
>
> Barry - http://www.4d-sport.com
>
> Vitaly Iourtchenko wrote:
>
> > > I would say the WRX - It's alot of car for the $$$$.
> > > We'll see what the IS 5 speed is like in August.
> >
> > It's a great car and all, but the WRX has a mug that only
> > a mother would love :)
> >
> > Vitaly
> > 87 CSP
|