basically, its knot recommended.
-james
----- Original Message -----
From: Rich Urschel <OSP13@attglobal.net>
> "Kelly, Katie" wrote:
>
> > I have reviewed the site.
> >
> > My involuntary reactions follow:
> >
> > Upon first opening the page (it took a moment to load), I saw,
> > "Bondage.com." Interesting enough, I thought. Nice design.
> >
> > Then came the chick in blue wrapped up in a rope.
> >
> > I screamed.
>
> Not to pick on my friend Katie, but the lady in blue
> that I saw is holding a whip with no rope in sight.
>
> Brooks,
> Speaking as but one member of the SFR Steering Committee
> who finds nothing "safe, sane, and consensual" objectionable,
> I would never vote to allow the words "Bondage.Com" on
> one our participants' car for the following reason:
>
> SOED:
> Bondage, n. Sadomasochism involving binding, hand cuffs, etc.
>
> That's a hot button. Just consider MTV's refusal to play
> one of Madonna's videos with simulated (actually just hinted)
> S&M after hawking it for a week. (Don't cry for her, it was her
> best seller.)
>
> There are people who object to AUTOCROSSING.
> Displaying morally provocative words on our cars would be
> tantamount to giving political ammunition to the enemy.
>
> Now I have to go edit my Netscape browser files.
> Rich Urschel
|