So the chasecam is just cheaper on soloperformance.com, and that's the only
difference, correct?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Chase" <randyc2@cox.net>
To: "adam popp" <raft321@fuse.net>; "autox team" <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: ChaseCam Question
> At 04:35 PM 9/17/2005, adam popp wrote:
> >I'm sure Randy Chase will answer this but, the ChaseCam from Solo
Performance
> >Specialists is the same as on Chasecam.com right?
>
> I hope so! :)
>
>
> > I'm going to buy one soon,
>
> Cool. It looked like most of the fastest SS guys were running Chasecams,
we
> almost got all of the top 5 spots. :)
>
>
> >and just saw 2 sample videos, one from solo performance.com and the other
from
> >chasecam.com. The one on the Whitworth's mustang looks fuzzy and doesn't
sound
> >as good as the Chasecam on chasecam.com. The video of Schotz's firebird
on
> >chasecam.com is all clear and the audio sounds great. So are these the
same,
> >just used differently or not?
>
>
> Neither really reflect what the camera really can do, since you are
looking
> at digitally compressed video. It all depends on the settings that the
> person uses to capture and compress the file for use on a computer or the
> Internet. However, I think the sample videos from SPS and the Schotz
videos
> were both done with the earlier "Conecam" which is a slightly lower
> resolution than the hires ChaseCam now on the market. But the raw video
> from a lower res cam, will look better than a hires source video that is
> more highly compressed.
>
> I will upload some video from Nationals this weekend, including Junior's
> fast SS run in the Pumpkin, and some splitscreen videos from CSP, all
> captured onto a solid state recorder.
>
> Randy Chase
> Stock F-Prepared Elise :p
> www.chasecam.com/
|