autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Turbine Q (RE: S2000 clutch)

To: "Autox list" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Turbine Q (RE: S2000 clutch)
From: Paul Parkanzky <parkanz1@msu.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 16:05:19 -0400
My father worked on the Chrysler Turbine car in the 60's.  I will ask him 
next time I talk to him.  He's told me stories about driving it all over 
the place.  Respectable gas mileage on the highway, or so I hear.

Paul Parkanzky
TeamMRC
www.TeamMRC.com

At 03:07 PM 6/9/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > Wouldn't a turbo-fan jet engine be considered internal combustion?
>
>Actually, this reminds me of something I was wondering about (and your
>question is helping to confirm my deduction)...
>
>Pardon my ignorance, here: In turbine-powered vehicles that are mechanically
>driven (as opposed to being propelled by the exhaust of the turbine), such
>as the Chrysler Turbine car of the 60's, jet-powered tractor pull
>"tractors", and possibly Jay Leno's motorcycle... Where is the mechanical
>link to the drivetrain? Is it really just the fan of the turbine? What kind
>of reducer must there be to translate that ridiculous RPM into streetable
>revolutions of something like a driveshaft?
>
>Believe it or not, this is the kind of pillow-talk that goes on at my house.
>
>-- Carrie
>
>116 ES/16 ESL

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>