This is 2003 and I know perfectly well what an S2000 is.
The whole purpose of my response was to poke fun at the 60000 RPM
mis-typed comment from another responder. He obviously meant to say
6000 RPM. And he responded with a link to pictures of a car that had
missed a down-shift at high RPMs and blown the motor.
SO... What's your beef? I would suggest that you read the entire
message - and the post that it was responding to - before you chime in
with a bunch of useless drivel.
John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman
B18c5specR@aol.com wrote:
> Do any of you replying to this thread even know what an S2000 is?
> If you can get ANY internal combustion engine up to 60000 RPM, you're
> going to eat up more than just clutches!!! 8<{) Even if it were
> possible to build an engine that would rev that high, I can't even begin
> to imagine what it would sound like!
>
> are you serious?
> When you have to get the engine to 60000 RPM to get enough torque to
> > get the car off the line, that tends to eat clutches...
> this is not 1976.
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|