autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: National/Divisional event caps

To: <bthatch@juno.com>, <evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com>,
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: National/Divisional event caps
From: "Dave Hardy" <dave2020@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 00:17:35 -0400
First off, I want to thank Mark, Karl, Ben, and everyone else involved in
pulling off events, be they Regional, Divisional, or National.  That said,
as someone who helps run Atlanta's events I am rather irritated at the
notion that anyone in Atlanta hasn't tried to help with the SEDIV Series.  I
know for a fact that Atlanta has asked to host a Divisional on SEVERAL
occasions.  We asked as early as last December, and as Recently as a month
ago, and several times in between.  We are the largest Region in the
Division, and a Central location in the Division, and yet the responses have
ranged from being ignored, to being told outright that there will be no
Divisional in Atlanta under any circumstances.

I don't know you Mark outside of email, and though I consider Ben a friend I
am the first to admit that he can be abrasive.  That said, it sucks for
everyone if personal dislikes / agendas / vendettas get in the way of
hosting events.  Let it be known to all who are listening that Atlanta wants
a Divisional in 2003.  We have the staff and equipment to pull it off, and
quite frankly, a 175 person cap would mean less work than our local events.

Regards,
Dave Hardy
89 SM

> Ideas are nothing new.  Anyone can generate them.  Greatness doesn't come
> from an idea, it comes from action.  It's easy to sit back and say
"somebody
> else should do this, and somebody else should do that" when you never have
to
> face the realities of the situations being faced by the somebody else's.
>
> I can't speak for the other divisions, but the SEDiv Solo2 program is
> administered by just two volunteer people with real lives and jobs outside
of
> Solo2.  One of the reasons I took over the SEDiv Steward position is
because
> nobody else was interested in stepping up to the plate.  I'm fortunate to
> have somebody like Karl Rickert at my side making the same amount of
> sacrifice, as well as the dedicated people who continually attend and help
> out at the SEDiv events.  Otherwise the SEDiv Solo2 program would have
folded
> "again" because nobody else was willing to pickup the torch.  To some
degree,
> the Nationals folks are in a similar situation, not everyone is a paid,
> full-time staff member.  I guess you could say we do this for our own
selfish
> reasons; it makes us feel good in our hearts to do our part in trying to
help
> other people enjoy the sport we love and hold dear.
>
> If this is such a great concern to you, why aren't you getting directly
> involved?  We don't need back-seat drivers, they are a dime a dozen.  We
> desperately need those rare people willing to sacrifice themselves for the
> benefit of the common good through positive action, not destructive
> self-serving sniping.  Oh, that's right.  You turned down my offer a month
or
> so ago to let you become the SEDiv Solo2 Steward for 2003.  You've done a
> great job participating in Atlanta on the regional level, but don't make
the
> mistake of thinking that you're now elevated to passing judgment on other
> programs with which you've had little or no direct participation in
> executing.
>
> Just out of curiosity, when were the last divisional/national events you
> attended?  By my recollection it was the Atlanta SEDivisional in Nov/2000
and
> the Meridian National Tour in Feb/2001.  Not that your lack of recent
> experience with either program really matters.  This is just your same old
> move trying to root the seeds of potential discontent to push an anti-SCCA
> agenda.  For those of you who haven't been around all that long, this
dirty
> little agenda comes crawling out of Ben's hole every couple of years.
Same
> agenda; different day, but old news just the same.
>
> Otherwise, this is all rather premature.  Having so many events cap out
for
> so many National/ProSolo events in the same year is a phenomenom new for
> 2002.  The SEDiv event at Gainesville is the first SEDiv event I know of
to
> ever to get a cap.  The SEDiv cap there is 175, at past SEDiv events we've
> been lucky to get over 120 participants.  The first 2002 SEDiv event at
Ft.
> Myers set a new attendance record at 143.  BTW, aren't those are the same
> events you complained about their location and inability to generate
> participation?  This level of competitor turnout is new to us.  Something
> must be right somewhere for so many people to want to attend.  Maybe we
all
> deserve to be spanked for not looking into our crystal balls and
forecasting
> a major increase in participation for 2002.
>
> It takes time to respond and address this new level of participation which
> only occurred this year, but that level of logic and understanding doesn't
> fit into your agenda, does it?  Then again, what do I know?  I've only
> attended 3 National Tour, 4 Pro Solo, and 1 SEDiv event so far this year.
>
> Mark Sipe

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>