Howdy,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Joe Goeke wrote:
> That's because the insurance companies are uninformed, uneducated, and quite
> simply are not out to serve their clients. They simply only want to make
> money from them.
Duh. After all, they're a business.
> I don't condone false claims to get the insurance companies to cover an
> autox accident, but I can see how the insurance companies have set them
> selves up for them.
What? How does that follow? Or do you mean that insurance companies
should cover autox claims directly so that false claims aren't necessary?
That's an opinion I guess. Personally if I were writing up policy
guidelines, I'd offer two versions. #1 would deny coverage at any
competition event, timed event, or racetrack activity. #2 would provide
coverage for single car compeition events, single car timed events, and
limited passing driving schools/track days.
#1 would get a slightly cheaper rate. Tell me you haven't heard of
someone stuffing their car at a track day...
I don't support a company dropping someone for autocrossing unless they
say somewhere in the policy that they'll do that. If they do, then you
shoulda read the damn thing. If they don't, threaten a suit / sue.
Mark
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|