I am told (I wasn't there so it's all heresay and legend to me) that the
reason you and I had to run DS with our covers in place is because someone
filed a protest on that very same thing. Is this not right? The reason it
matters is because someone said it matters by filing a protest. (or
threatened to do so.) Your "we" are "they" statement is exactly my point.
We (as competitors) protest meaningless and trivial (dare I say "weenie"?)
things, and then wonder why the rules don't cover every possible maniacal
interpretation. The answer to your question is not so much "why is there a
rules contradiction?" as "why do we allow this extremely insignificant
contradiction to matter?" My take on it anyway.
> Waddaya mean "someone took it to a rediculous level"? Who? Remember, "we"
> are "they". My only question is that once again it would seem (to me) that
> the rules contradict themselves. Which one takes precedence? And why?
> That's all I want to know. I have no problem running with the stupid tire
> cover in place as it affects nothing, but in the case of the Neons and
> similarly set up cars, why?
>
Patrick Washburn
C-Tech Trailer Cabinets
Designed for the Racer
Wausau, WI
www.racecabinet.com
715-355-8842
/// autox@autox.team.net mailing list
///
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe autox
///
/// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
|