autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Now definition of a Divisional Event

To: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@qwest.net>
Subject: Re: Now definition of a Divisional Event
From: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 16:11:30 -0400
Sam & Greg Scharnberg wrote:
> Please reference, Sec 1.5.2 page 49 (The definition of a
> Divisional Event.)  Yes, indeed all the criteria for a Divisional
> Event has been met.
> 
> Sections 6.10 nor 1.1 define a Divisional :-)

You're right about 1.5.2, I hadn't noticed that just now.  However,
1.1 still says that a Divisional needs to comply with the entire
book, which includes 6.10.

Eric makes a good point about some of the more difficult to enforce
rules -- yes, these too need to be enforced at all Divisional and
National events as described in 1.1.

I was actually asked to put on my helmet at Tech at some event last
year, but I can't remember which one.  4.1.C and 4.9 are somewhat
more difficult, as event officials cannot be asked to diagnose
medical conditions; these are surely here just to protect our
insurance policy after the fact.  But 6.10 is about the competition,
and is completely within our control.

Mark

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>