RE: SM/2 a go for 2001

To:	"Murray, Matthew D." <MDMURRAY@gwns.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>,
Subject:	RE: SM/2 a go for 2001
From:	"Dan USA" <dandalen@usa.net>
Date:	Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:33:02 -0800

> Personally, I think the 944 turbo should go to SM, not SM2, since its
> gearing works against the turbo's performance.
>

I have to agree. Besides, it has a back seat. Carried 4 people several
times.  I wouldn't want to sit in the back of a Mustang either.

None the less.  I'll have to make the decision to go with OSP or SM2. Nice
to have choices.

DanD
86 944T W/mods... (The car is a lot faster than the driver.)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, (continued) Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Matt Murray RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Zahornasky Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Kevin Stevens Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Eric Salem Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Scot Zediker Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Murray, Matthew D. Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Dan USA <= RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Richard Atkins RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Mark J. Andy RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Brad Cox RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Jeff Winchell RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Loren Williams

Previous by Date:	Re: STAC opening up STS for ringer tires?, Mark J. Hirt
Next by Date:	Re: what's going to rule GS in 2001?, JCGZ3
Previous by Thread:	Re: SM/2 a go for 2001, Paul Foster
Next by Thread:	RE: SM/2 a go for 2001, Richard Atkins
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]