autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped

To: ax-digest@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped
From: Jim Ochi <jochi@ricochet.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:40:45 -0800
>From: Larry Joffe <spdrcr5@bigfoot.com>
>
>- --> ?  I thought one of the key points of an SA helmet vs. an M
>- --> helmet was that it could absorb multiple hits...
>
>The ONLY difference between an SA and an M Rated helmet is the SA helmet has
>a Nomex liner.  That is it.  A friend of mine actually contact the Snell
>Foundation to ask this very question.

Not quite true.  The only difference in construction may be a fireproof 
liner, but the helmets have to go through different tests to get the M or 
SA rating.  From the FAQ on the Snell web site (<http://www.smf.org>):
==============
SA Standard was designed for auto racing while M Standard was for 
motorcycling and other motorsports. There are three major differences 
between them:
1.  SA standard requires flammability test while the M standard does not;
2.  SA standard allows narrower visual field than M standard (Some SA 
helmets may not be street legal);
3.  SA standard has rollbar impact test while M standard does not.
==============
So, some helmets may be able to get either of the ratings just by changing 
the liner to a fireproof one.  Other helmets (like some of the Bell or 
Simpson auto racing helmets) may not be able to get a M rating because the 
eye port is too narrow.  And still other helmets may not be able to get a 
SA rating even with a fireproof liner because they fail the rollbar impact 
test.

Jim Ochi
jochi@ricochet.net

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>