autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...)

To: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...)
From: "Brad Holliday" <bradholliday@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 02:25:22
>Right on Kimball :-)  Along with your best of bread example is an >example 
>of how classing similar type cars together is not being done >with these 
>cars either.  The best example is the 225hp TT Quattro >coupe and the 217hp 
>Talon AWD.  These are two ducks if I ever saw one, >yet one is in AS and 
>the other is in GS.


Admittedly, I don't know much about Audis, but it seems to me that if you 
move them to GS based on the "best in breed" rule, then you also need to 
move the BMW M3 and M3 Lightweight to GS to be fair.  And, while you're at 
it, you also need to move the 93-95 RX-7, MR2 Turbo, and 944 Turbo (and 968) 
to CS.  And the Boxter S and 911 Turbo to AS, etc., etc., etc.

I assume the Audis are in AS because they are similar in concept and
performance to a M3.

Brad Holliday
93 MR2 Turbo

_________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>