autox
[Top] [All Lists]

WRX Classing (fanning the flames...)

To: "'team.net'" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: WRX Classing (fanning the flames...)
From: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:39:55 -0800
Have you sent these thoughts to the SEB, Jim?  I will if you will...

Also booting the Audi S4, and 225hp TT up to AS when their lesser brethren stay 
in GS is a violation of the often applied "Best of Breed" rule that keeps older 
180hp Corvettes and Camaro/Mustangs suffering along in SS and FS with newer 
models that have almost twice the power and weigh less too.  
The BoB is also one reason for why the Type R was kept in GS with it's truly 
stock brethren.
Oh not to mention classing it before anyone (except GRM, what about it Per?) 
has even seen it, let alone driven one.  
Put the Audis, WRX, type.R , and DSM turbos together and that will make a 
pretty good class, and GS can return to "normal" mid-power Probe/MX6 and V-6 
Camaro/Mustang glory days.

But I've been running DSP for years why do I care, you ask?  

Kimball Ayer
AS/STS/SM? 
Y2K2 WRX 4ME

------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:31:57 -0500
From: "Jim Zeisler" <zeislerj@hotmail.com>
Subject: WRX Classing

In previous posts it appeared that the only options mentioned for the new 
WRX were either A/S or G/S.  I recall that these were the same choices for 
the Audi S4.  Why is it that a car that is too fast for G/S has to be bumped 
all the way to A/S?

If you look at last year's Nats results, there was a 5.7 second gap in the 
total time between these two classes.

A/S...107.2
B/S...108.6
C/S...110.9
D/S...113.6
E/S...113.6
F/S...110.4
G/S...112.9

It seems that cars that are too fast for G/S, but are similar in layout to 
these cars, become sacrificial lambs for the two seat rear drive sports cars 
in A/S, in order to not interfere with the criteria that have been 
established for the classes in between, such as the "Miata class", or the 
"Older Sports Car Class", or the "Neon Class".

IMHO, it would make more sense to break the current mold that has been 
established for D/S, and send these fast G/S cars into D/S, particularly 
since E/S and D/S times are closely matched.  Why not move the Type R, the 
DSM, and the 3-Series BMW into D/S, along with the WRX and the S4?  If the 
WRX and the S4 truly outpace the rest of this group, then perhaps there is 
justification for the move to a faster class, or maybe F/S for the S4, due 
to its weight.  If this year's D/S times were just an aberration, then 
perhaps the Neons will keep pace with this group.  If not, move all the 
Neons into E/S.

One further benefit of this approach is that an entire new group of cars 
will be competitive in G/S, ending the stranglehold of the Type R, which 
again IMHO, was a misfit for the class, and extended the misclassing of the 
Integra, which started with the GSR.

Flame suit on.

Jim Zeisler
E/S Celica GT
_________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • WRX Classing (fanning the flames...), Ayer, John K <=