To: | "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: STS Tires |
From: | washburn <washburn@dwave.net> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:20:43 -0500 |
Linnhoff, Eric wrote: > > Umm, what tire rule? There's already a crystal clear rule that all STS > tires must have a minimum treadwear rating of 140 and a width no more than > 225. STR gets referenced to the Stock Class tire rules. Where's the > ambiguity? Just curious what thoughts lurk in Roger's brain. I'm guessing that since the wear rating are commonly known to be basically useless, and easily circumvented, there remain a high potential for an expensive tire war. I would be concerned myself if I was getting into that class. Pat |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Crossing Tie-down straps/attaching points, washburn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | FW: How many year does STS have to be a "Supplemental class" (Reply from Howard Duncan), Ron Conrad |
Previous by Thread: | RE: ST as a National Class (was ?!?!?!) (the wrong list), Ron Conrad |
Next by Thread: | Re: STS Tires, Eric Linnhoff |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |