On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Rocky Entriken wrote:
> Sure it is. The comparison is "you could run Open, why do you want to run
> Ladies instead?" And the answer is "just because they DO." Let them be.
I don't want to run Ladies, but I can understand why people are upset
that half of the SCCA Solo2 classes are not available to them, because of
their gender, which makes no difference in driving.
I just think the Ladies classes should be subject to the participation
*RULES* like every other class. No has provided a good explanation for
why that subset of classes gets a free pass. If Ladies classes are so
necessary, and such a fabulous invention, we are so few of them
sufficiently subscribed? What happens to classes that are
under-subscribed and don't have an 'L'?
--
D a v i d H i l l m a n
scscc, nma, scca, imoc
|