autox
[Top] [All Lists]

getting rid of classes (women classes that is)

To: "Autox" <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: getting rid of classes (women classes that is)
From: "James Rogerson" <jwalter@ptra.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 18:05:04 -0500
This whole discussion started with eliminating marginally subscribed classes 
and along with that changing the definition of what number would constitute an 
under subscribed class, just too make the awards dinner shorter.

That led to leave "my" class alone and get rid of all those slow undeserving 
women.

Here's a deal for all of you.  I run in FP, by proposed new definition an under 
subscribed class.  When we are threatened with extinction, I'll file a suit to 
stay in because of sexual discrimination, naming each member of the SCCA as an 
offending party so I can intimidate and/or bother everyone.  We'll hold 
depositions in Houston and make sure warrants are issued to catch you scofflaws 
that come to Texas and fail to show for your deposition.

How's that for a deal.

Let's move on.  We already know what people do if they think the awards 
ceremony is too long, they leave early or suffer through just to walk the 
stage.  It's pretty easy to go up early and say, I'm leaving town give me that 
hunk of plastic, and just go home.


James Rogerson 
[FP #125] - Techless Racing TLS #18 
"Nails are glue, hypothetically speaking" - Lou Fertile 
"Men that like golf are unhappy at home and incapable of having a meaningful 
relationship with women" - Joseph Heller 

The census records were used in 1941-2 to identify, abduct and imprison 
innocent Japanese Americans. Be sure to fill out yours.  Trust them.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>