autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: OSP

To: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>, "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>,
Subject: RE: OSP
From: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:28:47 -0400
How would you PAX an abortion like that???

I believe developing STS and SM is the future eventually limiting or
destroying
Street Prepared, Solo II cannot have a class that says "whatever" we have
that it is called AM
What we need is a class where competition is fierce yet in underperscribed
Regions PAX can still compare your times against your friends.

Jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
Behalf Of Rick Brown
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:05 PM
To: Paul Foster; team.net
Subject: Re: OSP

CalClub and San Diego have had it for many years (called Street Mod way
before them others stole it) and it's basically ANY licensed car on DOT
tires. Period. End of Rules.

Rick Brown
FP 240Z


Subject: OSP


> <<<Listen up all you regional folks. Create a class like Open Street
> Prepared (OSP) where all your people who show up with kit cars,
> bored/stroked/cammed motors, popular (but illegal) engine swaps,
> suspension mods beyond Stock and Street prepared rules can run. Make 'em
> run on DOT tires and have the cars registered for the street. Then let
> 'em play in their own class.>>>
>
> Wow! Sounds like what a lot of us wanted SM to be until the rules got
> decided for us by some DSM driver...
>
> Paul Foster
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>