>Paul Foster wrote:
>
>> All very hilarious. So can anybody who was there comment what the
>> original course looked like and what was changed, or is that
totally
>> irrelevant or something?
>>
>
>Sarcasm? From Paul? LOL...
>
>Only irrelevant if you didn't read Matt Murray's considered opinion
and
>ascii art description that he sent to the list earlier.
I don't get it. I have searched every autox digest since 6/10 and I
cannot find a post by Matt on Ayer, particularly one that includes
ASCII art. Can someone either tell me which digest it is in or send a
copy of the original message to me?
TIA
Paul Foster
|