> Jason,
>
> Remember about a year ago you were talking (complaining) about the
> Integra
> Type R (a 2WD car) and how it was out of place in GS. Now you are
> saying
> that "GS is home to AWD iron" and "I think that's not fair". So the
> Eclipse is out of place in GS coz it is AWD?
I hoped that people wouldn't take this as complaining... I was trying
to have a classing debate without sounding like a whiner. I am having
a great time this year, and I am very happy with my results so far. I
am merely trying to talk openly about car classification. GS happens
to be the class I know the most about, because I am in it. Also, my
beef with the Eclipse is *only* in a ProSolo setting. I think it is a
good fit to GS in a SoloII setting, but in a ProSolo event, it carries
an unfair advantage. I think that ProSolo and SoloII classing should
be either seperate, or should take into account the factors of both
event. Whether or not you think I am complaining.
> Remember about a week ago you were talking about the mental factor.
> I
> think it is time to apply it to yourself. Forget about the other
> cars that
> you think have this feature or that feature and so are wrongly
> classed with
> your car in GS. Concentrate on "a little more teaking" of the car
> and the
> driver and see where that takes you.
I am concentrating on those things, and I am doing well at it. I am
not focused on the other guy. I am working on myself and my car. I
also still believe in my car. I don't think anything is *wrongly*
classed. I merely believe some things could be classed *better*. I am
not trying to create a spec Corrado class. I understand that generally
newer cars should be at the front of stock classes. All I am
interested in is parity.
-Jason Saini . Chicago, IL
-'93 Corrado . GS Sleeper
__________________________________________________
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
|