People, The ESP pax is representitive of the history of the class and everyone
knows that ESP has not been pushed to the limits yet.. as soon as it is the
pax time will reflect it. it all goes back to the past ESP CARS being, well,
slower then they can be.. Pax is reactionary, not proactive, if the M3's
force the ESP guys to step up and compete, (I expect it to take at least the
rest of the season) then the pax factor will reflect it.
heck look what happened to the supra in ESP last year, neat car, compeditive,
but the ponycar guys succeeded in their witchunt and got it reclassed for this
year.. AND IT DID NOT WIN!!! that was an SS car to ESP move..
lets make ESP cars faster instead of chasing away all the faster cars..
Jeffrey Lloyd
'96 BMW Z3 1.9 2fat4bs (ultimate tanning machine)
'81 Diesel Rabbit pickup (waiting TDI transplant)
On Tue, 30 May 2000, bob1 wrote:
> So Jeff, Please explain why it is OK for someone to take a WS-6,
> from SS, PAX = .830 to ESP, with easier PAX 0.822, add mods and be fair to
> other ESP folks ? I think there is more than one car wrong with ESP.
>Either the PAx
> is wrong or the WS-6 is classed wrong too. Can you think of one other car
>(besides
> these two) that can add mods and get easier classing ?
>
> At least the BMW comes from AS, PAX .815, and gets a harder PAX in ESP....
> (This will be in *my* letter to SEB :)
> Robert Larson
|