> - How would Bob Tunnell had fared the last couple years running ESP
> at Nationals? (I already know the answer. ;)
Did you remember that CSP ran in standing water and ESP ran in the dry in
'99?
Given Topeka's history, that could well be the case in other years, too.
Just an additional complaint--and this one about the structure of
ProSolo, not any
particular car or driver. If you are the class leader, what possible
incentive do you
have to drive faster on Sunday? All you do is lower your own index,
making you
need to drive faster in the Challenge (where you'll be facing other class
leaders
who may well have driven at 9/10 or 8/10 once they were pretty sure that
they
made the challenge). The *smart* thing to do is to drive just well
enough to
win the class and avoid breaking out *too* many times. Yuck.
Sure, there's $ for qualifying position, but the tire/manufacturer/etc.
contingencies
that you get for winning the Challenge* are more $ignifcant. I know that
Pro formats
have been thought over and thought over and thought over, but anybody
ever thought
of giving the top X qualifiers a bye round or two? That would seem to be
more motivating
and less encouraging of sandbagging.
The way the rules are now, I swear it reminds me of NASCAR--you don't
need drive
flat out to win the overall title. You just need to be close at the end.
mlc
'91 MR2 NA
* Not that I've ever experienced (or really expect to experience) that!
-----anything after this, I didn't write, and don't necessarily agree
with----
________________________________________________________________
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
|