autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Peru Pro (a bit long-ly overdue)

To: <TeamZ3@aol.com>, <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Peru Pro (a bit long-ly overdue)
From: "Alan Pozner" <apozner@ptd.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 20:22:55 -0400
Man, oh manishevitz :-}

-----Original Message-----
From: TeamZ3@aol.com <TeamZ3@aol.com>
To: cyberlaw@earthlink.net <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>; autox@autox.team.net
<autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Monday, May 22, 2000 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Peru Pro (a bit long-ly overdue)


>mAs awakens........
>
>Steve, you probably mean well but you just don't understand the entire
>subject.  Since at your own admission you're an attorney I'll forgive your
>inherent nature to argue every immaterial point into the ground.  However,
>unlike in the courtroom, your audience here is not a hand-picked bunch of
>morons and clueless nitwits intended to favor your case, propped up by a
>legal system dominated by self indulgent ex-cronies.  You should at least
>know better than to make a challenge before covering all the opponent's
bases.
>
>You can't just go out Sunday AM and make changes to the course in a Pro
Solo
>format.  All the previous runs are based on the original course, and unlike
>solo2, the times from Saturday and Sunday heats are not separate from each
>other.  To make a course deviation would require throwing out all previous
>times and starting over, which those of us who understand the Pro Solo
event
>format realize isn't feasible.  While every crooked plaintiff attorney in
>America has a vested financial interest in brainwashing society into
>believing that everything in life is cut and dry, and easily accounted for
in
>advance, some of the more intelligent and informed citizens actually know
>better.  It was a tough call with mitigating circumstances, but I believe
it
>was the right call regardless of the outcome.  I'm confident that the
>occurence of events will be accounted for in any future Pro Solo events at
>this venue.
>
>This isn't solo2, it isn't amateur solo; it isn't "make my attorney safety
>weenie wifey feel warm and fuzzy because, even though I have this incessant
>urge to point out that we're both attorneys, we can't possibly afford to
>repair some body damage" solo; this is PRO SOLO (maybe you should consider
>hiring an attorney and divorcing her if she can't accept who you are, or
who
>you want to be?).  As most on this digest know, I am very ardent regarding
>safety in a solo2 event because of the nature of the audience it attracts,
>but PRO SOLO is an apple, so don't try to compare it with an orange.  If
you
>or anyone else thinks that two cars can line up side by side and race each
>other WOT down a straight and never under any possible circumstance come
into
>contact with each other before ever even turning a corner then that's just
>ignorance at it's finest hour.  Just go down to the local dragstrip
sometime
>and sooner or later you'll see what I mean.  I have seen bone stock cars
>smash into each other coming off the start line.
>
>ps: I promise to lay off your profession if you promise to do the same.  It
>might be worth something in your social circle, but around here you're just
>another inexperienced, doesn't know squat rookie who's too ignorant to know
>any better.  In case my point isn't clear, the last thing PRO SOLO needs is
>for a bunch of wienerschnitzels like yourself trying to drag the big dogs
(or
>a wannabe medium dog like me :-) onto their rose-colored porch.  If you or
>anyone else doesn't like it then go find your own sandbox to play in.
Nobody
>is forcing you to eat dirt in this one.  Otherwise, come on out and find
out
>what a real butt-kicking is all about because you have a long way to go
>before the top of the ladder even comes into your range of vision, let
alone
>your reach.
>
>When the day comes that we hold everyone else responsible for decisions of
>our own free will, it also becomes the day it ceases to exist.  Bet they
>didn't teach you that in law school.
>
>mAs
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>