To: | Rocky Entriken <rocky@tri.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Cone Mulligans |
From: | John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com> |
Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:51:21 -0600 |
Rocky Entriken wrote: > > the more I think about it, my "three-for-free" rule in the Mirror Khana is > sort of a Mulligan rule. You're right! And it seems to have worked quite well over all these many years. (big snippage) > IOW, a key aspect of a mulligan rule is cone placement in the course design. Absolutely! And, if you do it right, the end result could be an absolute hoot!!! John (Old Fartz & TLS #37) Lieberman |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | List Suggestions..., Travis Bailey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Cone Mulligans, Engstrom |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Cone Mulligans, Rocky Entriken |
Next by Thread: | RE: Cone Mulligans, Engstrom |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |