autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: swaybar info(2)

To: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>, "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>
Subject: Re: swaybar info(2)
From: Judy Becker <judyb@cts.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 09:12:36 -0700
Hi fellas
I would suspect that our fella in a stock 4 dr. Geo Prizm who just beat a
CRX & Integra in ES might be interested in the sway bar discussion.

He often states that he wished his car would handle better.

HMMMMMM

Judy in San Diego   {:>} 


At 11:31 AM 10/13/99 -0400, Mark Sirota wrote:
>"Isley, Jason C." wrote:
>>         Buddy, for some reason you are still missing the root of this
>> discussion. The rule is outdated.
>
>I'll agree that the rule is outdated.  I'll agree that philosophically,
>either bar or no bar would be preferable to front bar only.
>
>But so what?  Yes, it's outdated.  Does that mean it has to be fixed?
>What, actually, is broken about it?  Why is it a problem?
>
>The only answer I've seen to that so far comes from Loren Williams:
>> C.  I don't think it's an issue of "fairness" or "competitiveness"
>> because if the swaybar rule is changed, cars will have to be reclassed
>> accordingly.  It's more a matter of allowing FWD drivers a
>> modification that will mean as much to them as the same modification
>> does to RWD drivers.  It's about making a grocery-getter FWD car more
>> FUN to drive in an autocross without having to leave stock class.
>
>The first part of this paragraph (allowing FWD drivers ...) makes the
>usual mistake of thinking that just because some cars are allowed some
>modification that it's only fair if everyone else can too.  For example,
>some Stock cars can get negative camber, and others can't.  Some have
>adjustable spring perches, others don't.  Granted, this one's in the
>rulebook while my examples are from the manufacturers, but I'm sure
>there's better examples.  That's all part of the equation, and cars are
>classed according to potential.  So I'm not swayed by that argument.
>
>The last sentence (making the car more fun to drive) is somewhat more
>persuasive.  Are we losing members because they can't do this?  My
>only relevant experience is in Volkswagens, and I would have changed
>the front bar on that car anyway even if I would have been allowed to
>change the rear.
>
>Personally, I'd like to see Stock Category go to Stock wheels and no
>spacers, but it's not broken enough to be worth fixing.
>
>By the way, C Modified has none of these sorts of issues.  It's a deep,
>popular, relatively inexpensive class with great people and really fun
>cars -- and none of this crazy rules banter.  Come join us.
>
>Mark
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>