autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: swaybar info(2)

To: "'Hottvr@aol.com'" <Hottvr@aol.com>
Subject: RE: swaybar info(2)
From: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:42:15 -0700
Sorry, was not aware they are front drivers, I also apologize to any other
people who own front drive cars that were built before I was born. 

Jason Isley
jisley@cell1.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Hottvr@aol.com [mailto:Hottvr@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 4:43 PM
To: JIsley@cell1.com; TeamZ3@aol.com
Cc: autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: swaybar info(2)


Ok, I have no dog in this fight and really don't care about the swaybar 
issue. However
when I read the statement below I thought "what is this guy talking 
about"????????
No front drive cars???? I wonder if he's ever heard of a little wonder
called 
a "Mini"?
You know that little "Bad ass" with frontwheel drive that started being 
produced
in the late  50's? 

Mike(I hate it when I have to agree with that Sipe fellow) B. TLS#1

Flame me its cool here in KC today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



In a message dated 10/12/99 4:15:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
JIsley@cell1.com writes:

<<  Buddy, for some reason you are still missing the root of this
 discussion. The rule is outdated. I would bet if you look at the results
 from nationals that at least half of the cars are front wheel drive. When
 this rule was created I would guess none of the cars were front drivers. >>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>