autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SCCA Valvoline Runoffs

To: "John Galligan" <galligan@gulftel.com>, <HAVOCDEAN@aol.com>
Subject: Re: SCCA Valvoline Runoffs
From: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 20:23:17 -0400
All in-car stuff requires a helicopter (expensive) or an airplane
to receive the RF signal from the car. Judging by the weather,
I wouldn't want to have been in a plane over Mid-Ohio Saturday.

Matt Murray

mailto:mattm@optonline.net

-----Original Message-----
From: John Galligan
Date: Monday, October 11, 1999 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: SCCA Valvoline Runoffs


>Yeah Dean, i do remember that.  The announcers did drop the ball
there. They did
>say something about that they could not use the in-car cameras due to
the
>inability of the aircraft to get off the ground.  This was due to the
weather, of
>course.  I never realized that in-car cameras were dependant on
aircraft, i
>wonder if this is true of all in-car cameras.  Neal did a great job
of handling
>that car, i'm sure he learned that watching you avoid cones :-).
>
>John Galligan
>galligan@gulftel.com
>SCCA-Gulf Coast Region
>Cavalier Z24
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>