> That's a good point mark. It does seem that this is evolving into a
>class for cars that run over 1bar. The way it's laid out now, you kinda
>gotta have a blower or a turbo if you're going to compete.
My point exactly.... And all wheel drive to put all the power down. This
seems like an Eagle Talon dominatrix class with a bunch of other cars
allowed in to make it an SCCA class. If you are going through this much
trouble why not find away to allow 2 seeters? With the rules you have now
do you really think a 1.8 litre Miata or 1.6 litre MR2 is going to dominate?
The Fiero? Why the exclusion when you are trying to be inclusive with such
a broad range of vehicles?
Rick Cone
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
To: Mark J. Andy <marka@telerama.com>
Cc: autox mailing list <autox@autox.team.net>; Dennis Grant
<dg50@daimlerchrysler.com>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 1999 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: STU Displacement Limit - An Idea
>"Mark J. Andy" wrote:
>>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 1999 dg50@daimlerchrysler.com wrote:
>> > STU displacement limits are as follows:
>> > - for overhead camshaft engines - 3.000 litres
>> > - for pushrod valvetrain engines - 4.000 litres
>> > - for rotory (wankel) engines - 1.500 litres
>>
>> Given no displacement breaks for NA motors, we could call this class FIM
>> for "Forced Induction Mod"... :-) (that's a good thing, btw. A class
for
>> modified streetable cars with forced induction seems to currently be
>> lacking).
>
> That's a good point mark. It does seem that this is evolving into a
>class for cars that run over 1bar. The way it's laid out now, you kinda
>gotta have a blower or a turbo if you're going to compete.
>
>-Josh2
>
>--
>Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR
> '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro
>
>jhadler@rmi.net
>http://rainbow.rmi.net/~jhadler/
>
|