TeamZ3@aol.com wrote:
> A clarification was issued stating that it was OK to remove the trunk
> mat so long as it was loose; i.e. wasn't held in place by factory-
> supplied fasteners (some trunk mats are held in place by a fastening
> system, RX-7TT mat comes to mind). Why should some vehicles get to
> remove an item, and others not?
Why should some vehicles get to have all-wheel drive, and others not?
Why should some vehicles get to have anti-lock brakes, and others not?
Why should some vehicles get to change their camber via crash bolts,
and others not? Why should some vehicles get to adjust rear toe, and
others not?
The rules are not in place to make every single car just like every
other one. Some cars have allowances that others don't. The classing
system takes care of the rest.
Mark
|