These cars (SS, WS6, and Supra TT) are a couple of cars that 'cheat the
classifications' in my mind. ESP has a softer factor than SS (.830 vs
.822). This would allow you to take one, add all the SP goodies and go to
a better PAX class...if I had an SS, WS6 or Supra in stock form, I would be
running it in ESP locally. Problem with the stock classing or the SP
classing? I think both in some cases.
AB
I know it's not a direct response to your (quite valid) question, but isn't
it a moot point? Why would you prefer to run in SS rather than ESP?
KeS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: richj50@bit-net.com [SMTP:richj50@bit-net.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 11:26 AM
> To: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
> Cc: autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Stock class for Firehawk
>
> On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com wrote:
> >
> > The Firehawk is specifically excluded from stock. 1999 rule book, page
> > 142.
>
> Okay, that sounds pretty definitive. Any particular reason why it should
> be classed separately from the Camaro SS? They both have the same
> options, both are ordered under standard GM option codes and both are
> modified at SLP. Why should one be in SS (or ESP) and the other only in
> ESP?
>
> Rich Johnston
> 95 Z28 ESP
>
|