Karl Witt wrote:
>
> On or about 12:07 PM 1/8/1999 -0700, Joshua Hadler did say:
>
> I concede on the should be legal but isn't bit. Slippery slope, yadda
> yadda, you have a point.
That's unfortunately the way the prevailing wind is blowing...
> >> But, we're talking about the price of GLUE here. No parts are being
> >> replaced. The analogy to retorquing bolts is very fitting here.
> >
> >No, tightening down on an existing hose clamp yes, but gluing a part
> >that was never glued by the factory is not legal. Does that mean that
>
> But it's not doing anything more than keeping said hose where they intended
> it to be in the first place. Under this reasoning, using loctite to keep
> any bolt on the car from backing out is illegal as well. And i know what
> you're going to say...under my reasoning, SFCs should be legal in SP
> because they're just keeping the subframes where the factory intended them
> in the first place. And, to that I say: you're right! let's start an SFC
> petition! ;) ;)
Aww... now ya done it! Ya done gone an made mention that SFC thang
again. Now we're both gonna be in trouble. I'm gettin' outa here! .... :-)
-Josh2
--
Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR
'87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro
jhadler@rmi.net
http://rainbow.rmi.net/~jhadler/
|