Kendall F Jones wrote:
>
> OK - I'm going to try one of those point by point replies everyone uses....
>
> >Rocky sayd:
> > I find myself in agreement with Josh2 on the Baby Grands. I like'em. And
> my
> > reasons basically mirror his.
> >
>
> Yeah, mebbe they are not so bad. There were parts of the course where they
> were absolutely (without a question) quicker than any "real" prod car -
> narrow little guys..... If they remain in DP - there will have to be some
> way to educate the rest of us on what is legal. I don't want the
> responsibility of guessing..... What if a privately owned BG winds up with
> an illegal motor (Is there such a thing as an illegal motor?), what about
> final drive? They have a potential engine that can match output of the A
> series motors (and twice the powerband), sequential trans, and more
> suspension adjustments than you can shake a panhard rod at. I dunno a damn
> thing about them.
Okay, fair enough. Does this help?
http://www.babygrandracing.com/rules.htm
:-)
No, I'm not trying to be a smart ass, just helpful.
-Josh2
--
Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR
'87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealth quattro
jhadler@rmi.net
http://rainbow.rmi.net/~jhadler/
|