alpines
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Re: Alpine versus Datsun Roadster]

To: alpines@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Re: Alpine versus Datsun Roadster]
From: Bob Douglas <b_s_d@ureach.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 23:12:41 -0500
________________________________________________
Get your own "800" number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag


---- On 8 Dec 2001 16:29:39, Jan Eyerman (jan.eyerman@usa.net) 
wrote:

> Datsun/Nissan signed a deal with BMC and assembled various
> Austin models...... 
> If you have ever seen a Datsun 1600 engine, you would swear
> it was a BMC "B" engine (as used in the MGA, etc.). 

A key point is that many of the components were not just knock-
offs, but built under license by Nissan, Hitachi, Mitsubishi, 
and others to a higher quality than the rest of the world's 
auto industries were willing to achieve during most of the 
1960s.

Both models of the Datsun Sports had ignition (coil & dizzy) by 
Hitachi and alternator by Mitsubishi.  The 1600 starter and 
S.U. type carbs were by Hitachi.  The 2000 starter was by 
Mitsubishi, the S.U. carbs were by Hitachi, and the Solex 
option by Mikuni.   Oh.. and Nissan left the leaks out when 
they assembled the engine.  BTW - the Solex equipped 2000 was 
rated at 150BHP versus 135 with the S.U.s.

I used a 1600 as a very reliable daily driver during much of 
college.  An excellent car to own, but the lack of quirks and 
related heritage made it almost too sterile.  It was a no 
brainer to sell when I was ready for a change.  Don't think 
I'll be able to reach that decision quite as easily with the 
Alpine. 

Regards,  Bob Douglas

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>