| To: | <6pack@autox.team.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [6pack] DOT 5 leads to hydraulic component failures |
| From: | "Robert" <trsix74@comcast.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:40:19 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | 6pack@autox.team.net |
| References: | <mailman.11.1360436403.18609.6pack@autox.team.net> <5116D9D2.5070404@charter.net> <CA+aQ7wxcfdGr363h7ju5+WLO6W4iW1Mv=KCsXTwgZOexX9K=MQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Thread-index: | AQLqFJPO9ApRho8k9W8u3mxM9tQttAH4WR+bAwCcnsaWE1eJYA== |
Did the originator of this issue completely replace all components and flush the lines before changing over to dot 5. Maybe I missed it, but looking back through the thread I could not find where that was substantiated. A simple flush without changing any contaminated rubber parts will lead to cross contamination, therefor brake failure. And when I say completely, I mean absolutely 100% with multiple alchohol flush of the lines. Just my two cents worth. ________________________________________ 6pack@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/6pack/mharc@autox.team.net |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [6pack] DOT 5 leads to hydraulic component failures, robert fabie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [6pack] DOT 5 leads to hydraulic component failures, Bud R |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [6pack] DOT 5 leads to hydraulic component failures, robert fabie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [6pack] DOT 5 leads to hydraulic component failures, Bud R |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |