| To: | johncnorth@gmail.com (John North) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Clutch master |
| From: | tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor) |
| Date: | Sun, 1 Oct 2006 22:24:27 -0700 |
John---Triumph went to the smaller CMC bore to make it easier to disengage the clutch. In the process of doing this, it also made it less tolerant to play in the pedal box. Which would you prefer? Dick From: johncnorth@gmail.com(John North) Is there any reason to stick with the .70 bore for a 1976? Wouldn't the .75 bore from the early cars make the clutch easier to push? John North |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | triumph tr250 question, Rusty Greer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oil filter canister, Sally or Dick Taylor |
| Previous by Thread: | Clutch master, John North |
| Next by Thread: | Differential Case Spreader?, John & Allison Cyganowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |