6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: roller rockers

To: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>, <6pack@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Re: roller rockers
From: Greg Dito <dito9561@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:05:36 -0500
JS will provide roller rockers in any ratio desired.  As Don, says, though, the 
increased lift is but one small part of a properly tuned modified engine.  
Consideration should start with what an owner wants out of the engine, planned 
budget, leading to cam selection and on from there.  The wilder the cam the 
more mods are needed to work with it (valvetrain, induction, exhaust) in order 
to maximize the cam's potential and deal with added internal stresses.  

Although I've not seen any comments to this effect, I wonder just what rocker 
ratio is really necessary to maximize power from a stock motor.  While the 
logic of "more is better" is often applied I would think that at some point 
much more stress and wear is placed on the valvetrain with diminishing return 
on power.

Greg Dito
> 
> From: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
> Date: 2003/12/23 Tue AM 09:36:18 EST
> To: 6pack@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: roller rockers
> 
> I agree.
> 
> I believe JS's roller rockers are 1.85:1 and as such should only be used 
> with a stock cam.
> 
> While I'm no expert, from everything I read and hear (Vizard, Kastner, 
> Burgess and others) there's lots more to performance than increasing the 
> lift on a stock cam.
> 
> 
> Don Malling




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>